Total Commodity Programs in Norton County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,343
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Norton County, Kansas totaled $147,310,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Nelson Farms Gp | Long Island, KS 67647 | $4,743,947 |
2 | Flying S Partnership | Norcatur, KS 67653 | $4,274,082 |
3 | Sumner Farms Inc | Norcatur, KS 67653 | $1,539,456 |
4 | Brooks Farm Inc | Clayton, KS 67629 | $1,531,411 |
5 | Pakkebier Farms LLC | Densmore, KS 67645 | $1,449,351 |
6 | Spring Creek Ranch Inc | Almena, KS 67622 | $1,390,585 |
7 | Tim Schulze | Norton, KS 67654 | $1,323,433 |
8 | Jon C Lofgreen Trust | Norton, KS 67654 | $1,271,163 |
9 | Esslinger Ranch Inc | Norton, KS 67654 | $1,251,629 |
10 | A & N Farms Inc | Norcatur, KS 67653 | $1,217,467 |
11 | D & C Cattle Co Inc | Norton, KS 67654 | $1,206,981 |
12 | John & Janet David Lvg Tr | Lenora, KS 67645 | $1,143,939 |
13 | Persinger Farms Inc | Lenora, KS 67645 | $1,143,425 |
14 | Monte Montgomery | Almena, KS 67622 | $1,126,146 |
15 | Tyler Harting Inc | Norton, KS 67654 | $1,107,437 |
16 | Sc Farms | Long Island, KS 67647 | $1,100,117 |
17 | Gene W Gallentine | Clayton, KS 67629 | $1,065,920 |
18 | Kindall Farms Inc | Norton, KS 67654 | $1,064,480 |
19 | Gary Mulder | Logan, KS 67646 | $1,050,351 |
20 | Juenemann Inc | Norton, KS 67654 | $1,030,161 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>