Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Osage County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 90
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Osage County, Kansas totaled $267,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Vaughan Trust For Kirk W | Prairie Village, KS 66208 | $1,440 |
42 | Jay G George | Lebo, KS 66856 | $1,400 |
43 | Owen Duane Young | Melvern, KS 66510 | $1,250 |
44 | Wayne E & Phyllis A Litch Liv Tr | Melvern, KS 66510 | $1,238 |
45 | W Edward Allison | Lyndon, KS 66451 | $1,165 |
46 | Irving R Niles Irr Tr | Wichita, KS 67205 | $1,085 |
47 | Ellen May Mcclain | Lake Oswego, OR 97035 | $1,055 |
48 | John U Butel | Overbrook, KS 66524 | $963 |
49 | Lynn E Silver Rev Tr | Burlingame, KS 66413 | $956 |
50 | Martha Elaine Toelkes | Berryton, KS 66409 | $915 |
51 | Roy D Mochamer Jr | Osage City, KS 66523 | $906 |
52 | Leroy C Ming | Scranton, KS 66537 | $900 |
53 | Neil K Smith | Overbrook, KS 66524 | $896 |
54 | Wilma L Schwemmer Tr | Lyndon, KS 66451 | $893 |
55 | Paul Edwin Schwemmer | Lyndon, KS 66451 | $877 |
56 | Christine M Berkley | Scranton, KS 66537 | $847 |
57 | Arb Living Tr | Melvern, KS 66510 | $807 |
58 | Brian - Davies Famil E Davies | Osage City, KS 66523 | $800 |
59 | Boyd E Romine | Burlingame, KS 66413 | $788 |
60 | Ronald R Neilson | Scranton, KS 66537 | $734 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”