Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Osborne County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 612
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Osborne County, Kansas totaled $4,338,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Roger G Schultze Tr | Waldo, KS 67673 | $10,846 |
122 | High Point Farms LLC | Hays, KS 67601 | $10,653 |
123 | Bradley Ray Davis | Portis, KS 67474 | $10,633 |
124 | Thomas & Teresa Gasper Trust | Tipton, KS 67485 | $10,591 |
125 | Brian R Mans | Osborne, KS 67473 | $10,589 |
126 | Lawrence M Pahls Trust | Tipton, KS 67485 | $10,353 |
127 | Brad L Noel | Portis, KS 67474 | $9,919 |
128 | John Simpson | Osborne, KS 67473 | $9,896 |
129 | Kan Farm Inc | Wichita, KS 67235 | $9,800 |
130 | David Bear | Waldo, KS 67673 | $9,650 |
131 | Herbert Hachmeister | Natoma, KS 67651 | $9,564 |
132 | Ryan Boden | Osborne, KS 67473 | $9,010 |
133 | Robert Boden | Osborne, KS 67473 | $9,010 |
134 | Matthew Boden | Osborne, KS 67473 | $9,009 |
135 | Craig A Doane | Downs, KS 67437 | $8,975 |
136 | Mcfadden Charitable Trust | Smith Center, KS 66967 | $8,962 |
137 | Randy E Roach | Alton, KS 67623 | $8,952 |
138 | Richard E Lonsinger | Osborne, KS 67473 | $8,849 |
139 | Covert Creek Cattle Inc | Hays, KS 67601 | $8,722 |
140 | Lyle Luhman | Natoma, KS 67651 | $8,721 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”