Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Phillips County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 58
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Phillips County, Kansas totaled $59,173 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Cleon Dettmer Revocable Living Tr | Smith Center, KS 66967 | $1,249 |
22 | Glen A Ross | Almena, KS 67622 | $1,227 |
23 | Phyllis Merklein | Prairie View, KS 67664 | $1,163 |
24 | Leland Duane Merklein | Prairie View, KS 67664 | $986 |
25 | Rodger D Wells Rev Trust | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $949 |
26 | Martin Bayens Jr | Long Island, KS 67647 | $890 |
27 | Gary Kats | Norton, KS 67654 | $889 |
28 | Esther Novak | Pocatello, ID 83206 | $833 |
29 | Kinsel K Kincaid | Kirwin, KS 67644 | $769 |
30 | Floyd D Wyley | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $697 |
31 | Dick E Miller Trust | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $671 |
32 | Lewann G Schneider Dvm | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $627 |
33 | Albert Shaw | Republican City, NE 68971 | $609 |
34 | John Goracke | Agra, KS 67621 | $607 |
35 | Arnold Grote | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $603 |
36 | L J Ranch Ltd | Logan, KS 67646 | $549 |
37 | Patricia Atchison | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $544 |
38 | Elizabeth Miller | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $510 |
39 | Kent Thalheim | Long Island, KS 67647 | $505 |
40 | Grace Deboer | Pella, IA 50219 | $490 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”