Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Phillips County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 374
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Phillips County, Kansas totaled $7,081,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Randall E Schmid | Kensington, KS 66951 | $71,734 |
22 | B-k Cox Farms Inc | Long Island, KS 67647 | $70,491 |
23 | Wish Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $66,733 |
24 | Stuart A Jarvis | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $66,250 |
25 | Paul R Beyerlein Trust | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $66,046 |
26 | Eric Alan Woodside | Prairie View, KS 67664 | $65,588 |
27 | Alan Woodside | Prairie View, KS 67664 | $65,433 |
28 | Michael Kats | Prairie View, KS 67664 | $64,821 |
29 | Wendell A Jarvis | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $63,258 |
30 | Gebhard Farms Inc | Long Island, KS 67647 | $62,125 |
31 | Conrad G Vankooten Liv Trust | Long Island, KS 67647 | $62,106 |
32 | Jeffrey Rose | Agra, KS 67621 | $60,125 |
33 | Matt Gower | Agra, KS 67621 | $57,552 |
34 | Clint Cox | Long Island, KS 67647 | $56,490 |
35 | West Cedar Livestock LLC | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $55,242 |
36 | States Cattle Co Inc | Logan, KS 67646 | $54,849 |
37 | Elwynn Jansonius | Prairie View, KS 67664 | $54,276 |
38 | Matthew P Jarvis | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $53,791 |
39 | Daniel P Beyerlein | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $53,760 |
40 | Kyle Dennis | Agra, KS 67621 | $53,352 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”