Conservation Reserve Program in Phillips County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 244
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Phillips County, Kansas totaled $483,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Karen L Thomason | Hays, KS 67601 | $584 |
162 | Ronald L & V Rae Iman Rev Living Trust | Albuquerque, NM 87122 | $581 |
163 | Pauline Mckinley Trust -karen Williams Sh | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $580 |
164 | Pauline Mckinley Tr-larry Mckinley Sh | Glade, KS 67639 | $580 |
165 | Brent Still | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $572 |
166 | William Still | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $572 |
167 | Joshua J Mcclain | Almena, KS 67622 | $550 |
168 | Rodger L Bogart | Kirwin, KS 67644 | $544 |
169 | Ferguson Angus Ltd | Agra, KS 67621 | $540 |
170 | Betty Zillinger | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $509 |
171 | Darrell D Bretton | Kensington, KS 66951 | $504 |
172 | States Ag Lp | Hays, KS 67601 | $501 |
173 | Dale E Holterman | Scott City, KS 67871 | $500 |
174 | Della F Still Trust | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $486 |
175 | Robert E Ragsdale Liv Tr | Agra, KS 67621 | $475 |
176 | David W Stapel | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $445 |
177 | Justin Everett Taylor | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $415 |
178 | K-4 Keeten Farms Inc | Glade, KS 67639 | $398 |
179 | Roderick G Britt - Britt Living Trust | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $375 |
180 | Cheryl E Hough Rev Trust | Kearney, NE 68845 | $371 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”