Total Conservation Programs in Phillips County, Kansas, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 265
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Phillips County, Kansas totaled $572,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dick E Miller And Lucille M Miller Irr Trust | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $4,047 |
42 | Elda Hamit Living Trust | Stockton, KS 67669 | $4,017 |
43 | Lottie Mccormack Trust | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $3,950 |
44 | Robert V Becker Rev Trust | Logan, KS 67646 | $3,926 |
45 | Michael C Harris Revocable Living Trust | Milford, KS 66514 | $3,679 |
46 | John Hudson Hales | Choctaw, OK 73020 | $3,651 |
47 | Marcia Sue Robbins | Derby, KS 67037 | $3,545 |
48 | Kathleen Ann Dawson | Greenleaf, KS 66943 | $3,545 |
49 | Jeff W Foster Rev Liv Tr Dated Se | Mcpherson, KS 67460 | $3,460 |
50 | D Brent Boyd | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $3,428 |
51 | Lewis Dean Imm | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $3,395 |
52 | John F Davis | Concordia, KS 66901 | $3,386 |
53 | Katherine M Davis Irr Trust | Wichita, KS 67212 | $3,385 |
54 | David D Reese | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $3,311 |
55 | Bar Diamond Ranch LLC | Stockton, KS 67669 | $3,257 |
56 | Brenda J Mcclure | Stockton, KS 67669 | $3,015 |
57 | Karin I Patton Revocable Trust | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $2,972 |
58 | Ronald L Becker | Logan, KS 67646 | $2,931 |
59 | Jack Gager | Kirwin, KS 67644 | $2,914 |
60 | Milo Max LLC | Broomfield, CO 80021 | $2,810 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”