Total Conservation Programs in Pottawatomie County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 880
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Pottawatomie County, Kansas totaled $22,998,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Stanton D & Charlotte K Brock Rev | Olsburg, KS 66520 | $419,171 |
2 | Daniel L Reves | Westmoreland, KS 66549 | $340,259 |
3 | Willis R Poppe | Olsburg, KS 66520 | $323,178 |
4 | Barbara Frank | Wichita, KS 67206 | $293,589 |
5 | Virginia Struble | Topeka, KS 66610 | $293,589 |
6 | Patsy J Weixelman | Topeka, KS 66618 | $274,845 |
7 | Peterson Feedlot Partnership | Wamego, KS 66547 | $232,642 |
8 | Ellen White Hargrave Rev Trust | Wamego, KS 66547 | $226,429 |
9 | Harold N Trick & Juliane S Essig Rev Trust | Olsburg, KS 66520 | $213,548 |
10 | Robert P Avery | Olsburg, KS 66520 | $210,352 |
11 | Betty Lindsey | Osprey, FL 34229 | $206,836 |
12 | A A Stock Farms Inc | Olsburg, KS 66520 | $176,496 |
13 | Donald E Brunin | Saint Marys, KS 66536 | $176,082 |
14 | White Ranch LLC | Wamego, KS 66547 | $173,821 |
15 | Agnes Boden | Seneca, KS 66538 | $164,910 |
16 | John R Hieger | Wamego, KS 66547 | $153,636 |
17 | Patricia Olson Rev Living Trust | Olsburg, KS 66520 | $152,488 |
18 | Delbert Ebert | Saint George, KS 66535 | $151,402 |
19 | Charles R White Rev Trust | Belvue, KS 66407 | $151,231 |
20 | Dennis R Stauffer | Wamego, KS 66547 | $148,381 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>