Farm Subsidy information
Rawlins County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Rawlins County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 646
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Rawlins County, Kansas totaled $31,406,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mike W Domsch | Atwood, KS 67730 | $101,412 |
42 | Urban Farms And Cattle Inc | Atwood, KS 67730 | $99,812 |
43 | John R Grafel | Herndon, KS 67739 | $92,647 |
44 | Leo D Stephens | Colby, KS 67701 | $92,558 |
45 | Mark Brown | Trenton, NE 69044 | $92,507 |
46 | David Lee Leitner | Atwood, KS 67730 | $91,997 |
47 | Ftc Real Estate And Investment Lp | Atwood, KS 67730 | $90,660 |
48 | Don Marshall Seeds Inc | Mc Donald, KS 67745 | $87,090 |
49 | Matthew D Dreher | Ludell, KS 67744 | $85,206 |
50 | Jeff P Unger | Rexford, KS 67753 | $84,827 |
51 | Sheldon G Nelson | Colby, KS 67701 | $84,298 |
52 | Brian Laufer | Atwood, KS 67730 | $81,513 |
53 | Blake D Bergling | Ludell, KS 67744 | $79,994 |
54 | Kyle-grafel Homestead Trust Grafel | Herndon, KS 67739 | $79,278 |
55 | Holste Homestead Inc | Ludell, KS 67744 | $77,870 |
56 | Joshua-joshua J And Lisa Wolters Rev Tr Wolters | Atwood, KS 67730 | $77,705 |
57 | Jonathan A Timm | Ludell, KS 67744 | $77,471 |
58 | Grant E Glad Trust No 1 | Atwood, KS 67730 | $77,276 |
59 | Scott Roesch | Colby, KS 67701 | $76,899 |
60 | Sherry Skolout | Atwood, KS 67730 | $74,882 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”