Farm Subsidy information
Rawlins County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Rawlins County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,575
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Rawlins County, Kansas totaled $358,258,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | K & K Farms | Herndon, KS 67739 | $4,148,756 |
2 | Franklin Farms | Atwood, KS 67730 | $3,520,289 |
3 | Denny-nickelson Farms Jv | Colby, KS 67701 | $1,967,458 |
4 | Fisher Farming | Mc Donald, KS 67745 | $1,945,744 |
5 | Ricky L Nemeth | Ludell, KS 67744 | $1,634,813 |
6 | Hagler Farm Inc | Atwood, KS 67730 | $1,598,676 |
7 | N And A Farms | Atwood, KS 67730 | $1,573,412 |
8 | Lankas Farms | Atwood, KS 67730 | $1,473,507 |
9 | Cwa Operating L P | Mc Donald, KS 67745 | $1,468,773 |
10 | Double R Ranch | Atwood, KS 67730 | $1,453,431 |
11 | Urban Farms And Cattle Inc | Atwood, KS 67730 | $1,451,514 |
12 | Ruda Family Farm | Lake Kiowa, TX 76240 | $1,441,257 |
13 | Willard W Miller Jr Trust | Colby, KS 67701 | $1,412,992 |
14 | Orten Inc | Bird City, KS 67731 | $1,410,511 |
15 | John E Skolout | Atwood, KS 67730 | $1,317,303 |
16 | David Earl Argabright | Atwood, KS 67730 | $1,312,831 |
17 | Paul Alan Hayden | Atwood, KS 67730 | $1,299,284 |
18 | Frisbie Wht & Hereford Farms | Mc Donald, KS 67745 | $1,296,282 |
19 | Ronald Bell | Mc Donald, KS 67745 | $1,267,155 |
20 | Horinek Brothers | Trenton, NE 69044 | $1,254,397 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>