Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Reno County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 681
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Reno County, Kansas totaled $14,199,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Sidney B Strohl | Pretty Prairie, KS 67570 | $120,285 |
22 | Matt Eskel Brack | Hutchinson, KS 67501 | $118,965 |
23 | Byron M Bergkamp | Mount Hope, KS 67108 | $116,435 |
24 | Paul Schweizer & Son Inc | Sterling, KS 67579 | $113,967 |
25 | Dan R Schweizer | Sterling, KS 67579 | $111,630 |
26 | Hershberger Farm Inc | Partridge, KS 67566 | $107,350 |
27 | Tedd J Kimmel | Hutchinson, KS 67504 | $102,024 |
28 | Mary Ann Strohl | Pretty Prairie, KS 67570 | $100,593 |
29 | A & B Cattle LLC | Partridge, KS 67566 | $96,462 |
30 | Joe Hedrick | Nickerson, KS 67561 | $95,095 |
31 | 3s Cattle LLC | Pretty Prairie, KS 67570 | $92,171 |
32 | Clinton E Moore & Sons Inc | Nickerson, KS 67561 | $90,497 |
33 | Steve Kraft | Abbyville, KS 67510 | $88,726 |
34 | Heath Bergkamp | Arlington, KS 67514 | $80,846 |
35 | Bruce A Kaufman | Pretty Prairie, KS 67570 | $80,686 |
36 | Ast Brothers Cattle Company, LLC | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $79,109 |
37 | Tanner L Wilkey | Sterling, KS 67579 | $77,038 |
38 | Kelly Schmucker Rev Trust | Hutchinson, KS 67501 | $76,850 |
39 | Kevin R Graber | Pretty Prairie, KS 67570 | $74,045 |
40 | Leon Albright | Pretty Prairie, KS 67570 | $73,685 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”