Market Loss Assistance Program in Reno County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,188
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Reno County, Kansas totaled $24,905,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John R Evans Inc | Overland Park, KS 66214 | $77,791 |
42 | Paul Schweizer & Son Inc | Sterling, KS 67579 | $77,554 |
43 | Moeckel Grain & Beef Inc | Sylvia, KS 67581 | $76,664 |
44 | Wayne E Yoder | Hutchinson, KS 67501 | $76,431 |
45 | Donald L Bogner Rev Tr | Haven, KS 67543 | $75,756 |
46 | David J Bogner | Mount Hope, KS 67108 | $74,728 |
47 | Duane J Bogner Rev Tr | Mount Hope, KS 67108 | $74,650 |
48 | Loren L Alderson | Nickerson, KS 67561 | $73,440 |
49 | Brent Stuckey | Abbyville, KS 67510 | $73,184 |
50 | Patrick F Henke | Nickerson, KS 67561 | $70,867 |
51 | Jack Fountain | Arlington, KS 67514 | $70,816 |
52 | Kim Krehbiel | Pratt, KS 67124 | $70,497 |
53 | Craig Stauffer | Arlington, KS 67514 | $70,350 |
54 | Morris Yoder | Hutchinson, KS 67501 | $70,345 |
55 | Dwight R Allsup | Bella Vista, AR 72715 | $69,428 |
56 | Jerry Dean Miller | Trophy Club, TX 76262 | $69,174 |
57 | Connie Dillon | Hutchinson, KS 67502 | $69,100 |
58 | Roger Stade | Haven, KS 67543 | $68,804 |
59 | Kittle M Family Tust Agreement | Sterling, KS 67579 | $68,729 |
60 | Conard Woodson Inc | Penalosa, KS 67035 | $68,203 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”