Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Reno County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 202
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Reno County, Kansas totaled $1,220,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Sig Collins | Partridge, KS 67566 | $8,975 |
42 | Wesley Nunemaker | Tulsa, OK 74137 | $8,913 |
43 | Dennis L Schmidt | Lawrence, KS 66047 | $8,795 |
44 | Ron A Borth | Arlington, KS 67514 | $8,745 |
45 | Roy Peterson | Arlington, KS 67514 | $8,600 |
46 | Laverne Kestler Rev Trust | Turon, KS 67583 | $8,539 |
47 | Melva J Sankey Rev Trust | Sterling, KS 67579 | $8,182 |
48 | Sankey Family Trust | Sterling, KS 67579 | $8,182 |
49 | A A & Elizabeth Bontrager Trust | South Hutchinson, KS 67505 | $8,083 |
50 | Paradise Land & Cattle Co Lp | Stafford, KS 67578 | $7,640 |
51 | Paul E Kemp | Pretty Prairie, KS 67570 | $7,625 |
52 | Steven W Yust Trust | Sylvia, KS 67581 | $7,448 |
53 | Vernon J Kraus Jr | Pretty Prairie, KS 67570 | $7,056 |
54 | Dee Brooks | Arlington, KS 67514 | $6,919 |
55 | Paul E Rogers Trust | Pretty Prairie, KS 67570 | $6,809 |
56 | Larry R Davisson | Plevna, KS 67568 | $6,801 |
57 | David Munden | Hutchinson, KS 67501 | $6,730 |
58 | Lorne Kuepfer | Hutchinson, KS 67501 | $6,727 |
59 | Loren Beachy | Hutchinson, KS 67501 | $6,615 |
60 | John Meisenheimer | Pretty Prairie, KS 67570 | $6,508 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”