Total Conservation Programs in Reno County, Kansas, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,918

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Reno County, Kansas totaled $105,617,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
61Patricia Cramton Rev TrustPretty Prairie, KS 67570$242,255
62Joseph W Seiwert-joseph & Linda Seiwert TrustPretty Prairie, KS 67570$237,296
63Mcreynolds Melville Hindsley FarmsHutchinson, KS 67502$236,119
64Steven A Westfahl Rev TrustHaven, KS 67543$234,035
65Jack Delventhal TrustArlington, KS 67514$233,700
66Rdg Childrens Revoc Living TrustHutchinson, KS 67502$232,624
67Evelyn Dye Rev TrustTuron, KS 67583$230,927
68Zack CollinsPartridge, KS 67566$226,262
69Mcginn Brothers IncOlathe, KS 66062$223,431
70Douglas G Wildin Trust No 1Hutchinson, KS 67501$223,340
71Phyllis J Stucky Living TrustPretty Prairie, KS 67570$220,114
72Stucky Red Bluff IncPrairie Village, KS 66208$219,267
73Steven E LockeHutchinson, KS 67502$218,357
74Gary F MeggersSylvia, KS 67581$218,112
75A & L Farms IncPenalosa, KS 67035$216,717
76Judith A Jones BensonPartridge, KS 67566$216,388
77Harold E Miller JrMesquite, NV 89024$215,796
78Connie J Van CampenTuron, KS 67583$212,533
79Dale HansenLangdon, KS 67583$211,797
80Robert G MillerSylvia, KS 67581$210,247

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag