Conservation Reserve Program in Reno County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 649
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Reno County, Kansas totaled $2,786,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Branscom Trust | Hutchinson, KS 67501 | $7,543 |
102 | Karen Snay | Plevna, KS 67568 | $7,461 |
103 | Aaron J Thompson | Ellsworth, KS 67439 | $7,451 |
104 | Jerry Ricksecker | Hutchinson, KS 67502 | $7,446 |
105 | Budd Fountain | Langdon, KS 67583 | $7,356 |
106 | Larry Breidenstein | Arlington, KS 67514 | $7,319 |
107 | Charles Welsh Trust | Hutchinson, KS 67502 | $7,234 |
108 | Justin Bland | Partridge, KS 67566 | $7,191 |
109 | Pugnea & Bailie LLC | Tucson, AZ 85711 | $7,154 |
110 | Florene M Krehbiel Trust | Pretty Prairie, KS 67570 | $6,892 |
111 | Curtis & Jean Graber Tr Dtd June 26 2008 | Hutchinson, KS 67501 | $6,840 |
112 | The Salvation Army | Garden City, KS 67846 | $6,798 |
113 | Staats Farms LLC | Ulysses, KS 67880 | $6,795 |
114 | Glenice K Dame | Claremore, OK 74019 | $6,795 |
115 | Mary Ann Potter Isaacs | Arlington, KS 67514 | $6,758 |
116 | Donald J Potter-donald & Barbara Potter Liv Trust | Arlington, KS 67514 | $6,758 |
117 | John L Baldwin Family Trust No 1 | Hutchinson, KS 67504 | $6,684 |
118 | Boyd D Rostine | Hutchinson, KS 67504 | $6,680 |
119 | Kristi Murphy | Kingsport, TN 37664 | $6,648 |
120 | Melvin Fesler Irrev Tr | Kingsport, TN 37664 | $6,587 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”