SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Reno County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 514
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Reno County, Kansas totaled $5,013,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Rodney Bergkamp | Arlington, KS 67514 | $56,611 |
22 | Michael Miller | Partridge, KS 67566 | $56,203 |
23 | Stroberg Land & Cattle LLC | Hutchinson, KS 67502 | $56,027 |
24 | H & R Hill Farms Inc | Partridge, KS 67566 | $55,864 |
25 | Russell R Blew Farms Inc | Pretty Prairie, KS 67570 | $55,301 |
26 | Terry D Krehbiel | Pretty Prairie, KS 67570 | $52,264 |
27 | Mizell Farms Inc | Nickerson, KS 67561 | $50,858 |
28 | Dwight R Allsup | Bella Vista, AR 72715 | $49,920 |
29 | Rex Blew Inc | Hutchinson, KS 67501 | $47,494 |
30 | Richard L Krehbiel | Pretty Prairie, KS 67570 | $46,909 |
31 | Matt Eskel Brack | Hutchinson, KS 67501 | $43,549 |
32 | Gary A Johnson | Burrton, KS 67020 | $42,459 |
33 | John M Greer | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $39,894 |
34 | Brian Stauffer | Arlington, KS 67514 | $39,190 |
35 | Larry & Judith Griffith Rev Trust | Nickerson, KS 67561 | $38,666 |
36 | Sivils 50/50 Farm Inc | Nickerson, KS 67561 | $38,426 |
37 | Ryan Mark Jacques | Hutchinson, KS 67501 | $37,157 |
38 | Kittle M Family Tust Agreement | Sterling, KS 67579 | $36,357 |
39 | John L Bennett | Sterling, KS 67579 | $35,998 |
40 | Henke Farms Ptnr | Nickerson, KS 67561 | $34,952 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”