Total Conservation Programs in Rice County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 921
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Rice County, Kansas totaled $16,795,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Gregory L O'neill | Little River, KS 67457 | $32,655 |
142 | Arleen Branson Trust | Prairie Village, KS 66207 | $32,606 |
143 | Lex Thompson Tr | Russell, KS 67665 | $32,251 |
144 | Jacqueline K Ramage Trust | Little River, KS 67457 | $31,937 |
145 | Jarrod P Rowland | Sterling, KS 67579 | $31,757 |
146 | Leroy Hayes | Geneseo, KS 67444 | $31,713 |
147 | Richard L Drake Jr | Canton, KS 67428 | $31,507 |
148 | Douglas Keesling | Chase, KS 67524 | $31,470 |
149 | Virginia G Thomas | Ellinwood, KS 67526 | $31,229 |
150 | Floyd W Sweet | Hutchinson, KS 67502 | $30,651 |
151 | Duane & Susan Drake Family Trust | La Jolla, CA 92037 | $30,579 |
152 | Barbara Gay Sikonski | Nixa, MO 65714 | $30,526 |
153 | Howard Blakely Williford | Monroe, WA 98272 | $30,526 |
154 | Gene & Marie Heckel Rev Trust | Abilene, KS 67410 | $30,122 |
155 | Charles K Helwick | Salina, KS 67401 | $30,021 |
156 | Joe R Swanson | Windom, KS 67491 | $29,979 |
157 | Donald R Schardein Rev Living Tr | Manhattan, KS 66503 | $28,429 |
158 | Byron K Willhaus | Sterling, KS 67579 | $28,417 |
159 | Francis W Drake Trust | La Jolla, CA 92037 | $28,385 |
160 | Geral Schmidt Trust | Sterling, KS 67579 | $28,304 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”