Conservation Reserve Program in Riley County, Kansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 67
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Riley County, Kansas totaled $96,392 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jim Eggerman | Green, KS 67447 | $524 |
42 | Ronald D Klataske | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $471 |
43 | Daniel L Boyle | Manhattan, KS 66503 | $440 |
44 | Walter Rudolph | Blue Rapids, KS 66411 | $419 |
45 | Dallas L Nelson Credit Shelter Trust | Wakefield, KS 67487 | $395 |
46 | Lee D Barr | Canton, TX 75103 | $380 |
47 | , | $380 | |
48 | Pfaff Farms General Partnership | Randolph, KS 66554 | $372 |
49 | Norman H Danielsen Trust-norman H Danielsen | Randolph, KS 66554 | $371 |
50 | Kirk Zerbe | Belvue, KS 66407 | $305 |
51 | , | $305 | |
52 | David Bruce Mengel | Randolph, KS 66554 | $284 |
53 | Darrell D Westervelt Trust | Manhattan, KS 66503 | $263 |
54 | David Cederberg | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $257 |
55 | Robert Alexander | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $228 |
56 | Wm Alexander | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $227 |
57 | Allen C Schwartz | Manhattan, KS 66503 | $165 |
58 | Thomas E Kimball Family Trust | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $162 |
59 | Cedar Creek Ks 2 Farm LLC | Springdale, AR 72764 | $142 |
60 | Rick Chaffee | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $140 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”