Conservation Reserve Program in Rooks County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 307
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Rooks County, Kansas totaled $748,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Keith M Chesney Tr | Woodston, KS 67675 | $3,743 |
62 | Tony Mcreynolds-tony & Wynn Mcreynolds Trust | Stockton, KS 67669 | $3,704 |
63 | Tyler Muir | Stockton, KS 67669 | $3,603 |
64 | Cecil Roy | Stockton, KS 67669 | $3,543 |
65 | Hance Cattle Co | Stockton, KS 67669 | $3,526 |
66 | Judy Sander | Plainville, KS 67663 | $3,445 |
67 | Nila Denton | Manitou Springs, CO 80829 | $3,382 |
68 | Patricia S Dix | Stockton, KS 67669 | $3,332 |
69 | Steve Cook - Cook Living Trust | Stockton, KS 67669 | $3,276 |
70 | Brad Waller | Stockton, KS 67669 | $3,274 |
71 | Michael Mcclellan | Plainville, KS 67663 | $3,252 |
72 | Leona Newell | Damar, KS 67632 | $3,236 |
73 | William D Tomasheck | Zurich, KS 67663 | $3,235 |
74 | William F Bowman And Lois M Bowman Rev Living Trus | Natoma, KS 67651 | $3,235 |
75 | Victoria M Balthazor | Palco, KS 67657 | $3,197 |
76 | M Leo Kollman | Plainville, KS 67663 | $3,080 |
77 | Bernard R Gehring | Wylie, TX 75098 | $3,067 |
78 | Elaine R Maddy Trust | Stockton, KS 67669 | $3,066 |
79 | Richard J Benoit Tr No 1 | Damar, KS 67632 | $3,003 |
80 | Eichman Brothers Farm LLC | Hill City, KS 67642 | $2,994 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”