Direct Payment Program in Rooks County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,571
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Rooks County, Kansas totaled $31,817,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | James A Stice | Stockton, KS 67669 | $136,296 |
62 | H Leon Ross | Plainville, KS 67663 | $134,967 |
63 | Roger L Comeau | Plainville, KS 67663 | $133,028 |
64 | Gene Theleman | Natoma, KS 67651 | $131,626 |
65 | Thomas F Benoit | Damar, KS 67632 | $130,414 |
66 | Donovan P Benoit | Damar, KS 67632 | $130,401 |
67 | Thompson Cattle Co LLC | Plainville, KS 67663 | $129,896 |
68 | Jerry Roy | Stockton, KS 67669 | $129,555 |
69 | Will R Stout | Natoma, KS 67651 | $127,074 |
70 | Harold W Lowry Inc | Stockton, KS 67669 | $124,634 |
71 | Tom Cat LLC | Zurich, KS 67663 | $124,540 |
72 | Donald Mclaughlin | Stockton, KS 67669 | $123,998 |
73 | Donna R Rostocil | Plainville, KS 67663 | $121,243 |
74 | Gregg Gartrell - Gregory And Susan Gartrell Trust | Stockton, KS 67669 | $118,082 |
75 | Alvin G Hamel | Damar, KS 67632 | $117,973 |
76 | William E Mccune | Plainville, KS 67663 | $117,607 |
77 | Ronald Keirns | Stockton, KS 67669 | $116,518 |
78 | John Griebel | Stockton, KS 67669 | $115,489 |
79 | Bernard J Carsten | Stockton, KS 67669 | $114,934 |
80 | Paul Hachmeister Rev Trust | Natoma, KS 67651 | $111,391 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”