Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Rooks County, Kansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 479
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Rooks County, Kansas totaled $1,225,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | R Alan- Alan & Corrine Dix Living Trust Dix | Stockton, KS 67669 | $40,871 |
2 | Niblock Living Trust | Stockton, KS 67669 | $38,419 |
3 | Donald E Lucky Living Trust | Stockton, KS 67669 | $38,405 |
4 | Gm Dix Inc | Woodston, KS 67675 | $35,750 |
5 | Timothy J Berland Trust No 1 | Damar, KS 67632 | $35,278 |
6 | Riffel Farms Inc | Stockton, KS 67669 | $34,210 |
7 | Mr Ronnie Edward Mongeau | Zurich, KS 67663 | $30,692 |
8 | John C Griebel | Stockton, KS 67669 | $26,596 |
9 | Whisman Bros LLC | Palco, KS 67657 | $25,014 |
10 | Rodney L Marcotte | Hays, KS 67601 | $23,700 |
11 | Daniel R Gasper Trust No 1 | Stockton, KS 67669 | $21,934 |
12 | Darren A Rubottom | Woodston, KS 67675 | $21,710 |
13 | Jerry Mcreynolds-jerry C Mcreynolds Trust No 1 | Woodston, KS 67675 | $21,599 |
14 | Tim Benoit | Damar, KS 67632 | $20,248 |
15 | Brenda Werth-benoit | Damar, KS 67632 | $20,245 |
16 | Mcclellan Farms LLC | Plainville, KS 67663 | $19,652 |
17 | Tyler Muir | Stockton, KS 67669 | $17,768 |
18 | Damion Dix | Stockton, KS 67669 | $16,678 |
19 | Bar D Ranch LLC | Woodston, KS 67675 | $16,242 |
20 | Leo Oliva Rev Trust | Woodston, KS 67675 | $15,849 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>