Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program in Rush County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 96
Recipients of Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program from farms in Rush County, Kansas totaled $129,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Emile Frick | Nekoma, KS 67559 | $535 |
42 | Bernadine R Hammeke | Rozel, KS 67574 | $524 |
43 | Paul M Leiker | Hays, KS 67601 | $523 |
44 | Isabel R Moran Family Trust | Topeka, KS 66614 | $504 |
45 | Terry Conard-conard Living Trust Dated 9-17-16 | Timken, KS 67575 | $421 |
46 | Timothy Oborny Living Trust 4-16-12 | Bison, KS 67520 | $421 |
47 | John R Elmore III | Lawrence, KS 66047 | $417 |
48 | Larry Max Seltmann | Topeka, KS 66606 | $392 |
49 | Ralph Wellbrock | Hays, KS 67601 | $388 |
50 | Francis F Braun Rev Liv Trust | Mc Cracken, KS 67556 | $380 |
51 | Kathleen Moran | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $352 |
52 | Cheryl S Lamer Revocable Trust | Scottsdale, AZ 85258 | $348 |
53 | Kimberly A Brockman | Lawrence, KS 66047 | $336 |
54 | Norma L Kober | Southlake, TX 76092 | $336 |
55 | Lance T Russell | Hays, KS 67601 | $335 |
56 | Beulah Irvin | Hays, KS 67601 | $320 |
57 | Isabel R Moran Family Trust | Topeka, KS 66614 | $299 |
58 | Sharon Snavely | Shell Knob, MO 65747 | $296 |
59 | Fay Dixon | Hilton Head Island, SC 29926 | $290 |
60 | Kay Lamer | Arlington, MA 02476 | $290 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”