Farm Subsidy information
Rush County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Rush County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,175
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Rush County, Kansas totaled $10,431,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Bernard Juno | Bison, KS 67520 | $45,061 |
42 | Eric M Oborny | Alexander, KS 67513 | $41,391 |
43 | Craig Jecha | Timken, KS 67575 | $40,656 |
44 | Timken Seed Farms Inc | Timken, KS 67575 | $40,558 |
45 | Richard T Luft | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $36,100 |
46 | Maier Family Trust Dated 12-28-92 | Otis, KS 67565 | $36,082 |
47 | D & V Brack Family Limited Partnership | Bullhead City, AZ 86429 | $35,916 |
48 | Lamer Farms Inc | Scottsdale, AZ 85258 | $35,791 |
49 | Schroeder Family Farms Inc | Russell, KS 67665 | $34,627 |
50 | Ed Junior Farm Inc | Bison, KS 67520 | $34,536 |
51 | Anthony C Vondracek | Timken, KS 67575 | $34,131 |
52 | Clifford C Bizek Real Estate Trust | Dallas, TX 75225 | $34,093 |
53 | John A Koriel | Rush Center, KS 67575 | $33,954 |
54 | Leslie A & Sheryl R Rogers Fam Tr | Mc Cracken, KS 67556 | $33,695 |
55 | Dome Living Trust 5-17-2000 | Bison, KS 67520 | $32,147 |
56 | Chase Rogers | Mc Cracken, KS 67556 | $31,205 |
57 | Roger C Mohr - Mohr Family Trust | Albert, KS 67511 | $30,682 |
58 | Dennis Gottschalk | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $30,330 |
59 | Charles M Vondracek | Timken, KS 67575 | $30,225 |
60 | Darrel Urban | Bison, KS 67520 | $30,102 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”