Conservation Reserve Program in Rush County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 380
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Rush County, Kansas totaled $814,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Don L Riedl Family Revocable Trust | Sherman, TX 75092 | $5,325 |
42 | Norman Legleiter | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $5,295 |
43 | Thomas D Adcock | Hays, KS 67601 | $5,081 |
44 | Marc Brack | Mesa, AZ 85213 | $4,970 |
45 | Troy A Schroeder Rev Trust | Albert, KS 67511 | $4,946 |
46 | Melvin Hair | Brownell, KS 67521 | $4,820 |
47 | Bostetter Group LLC | Alexandria, VA 22314 | $4,683 |
48 | Mary Rose Pickle | Wichita, KS 67226 | $4,422 |
49 | Joyce Kallenberger | Weatherby Lake, MO 64152 | $4,422 |
50 | Pamela J Dierberger - Pamela J Dierberger Trust | Beatrice, NE 68310 | $4,366 |
51 | Mark A Dewald - Mark & Enid Dewald Trust | Alexander, KS 67513 | $4,357 |
52 | B & B Heirs LLC | Hays, KS 67601 | $4,288 |
53 | Eleanor Wells | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $4,168 |
54 | Ken Georg Farms LLC | Sabetha, KS 66534 | $4,029 |
55 | Patricia A Petz Rev Inter Vivos Tr | Mc Cracken, KS 67556 | $4,023 |
56 | Gail L Dreiling Living Trust 1-26-11 | Ellis, KS 67637 | $3,983 |
57 | Craig Scheuerman - Scheuerman Living Trust | Bison, KS 67520 | $3,958 |
58 | Randy D Rodgers | Hays, KS 67601 | $3,940 |
59 | Harold R Legleiter | Hays, KS 67601 | $3,939 |
60 | Ricky L Stejskal | Wilmington, DE 19808 | $3,840 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”