Total Conservation Programs in Rush County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,717
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Rush County, Kansas totaled $51,533,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Maryann Bucl | Linwood, KS 66052 | $103,308 |
122 | Patricia A Taylor | Los Angeles, CA 90041 | $103,057 |
123 | Donald Seltmann | Hutchinson, KS 67502 | $102,502 |
124 | Kyle Tammen | Rush Center, KS 67575 | $102,370 |
125 | Ken Phillips | Nekoma, KS 67559 | $102,197 |
126 | Marvin Herrman | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $101,556 |
127 | Eugene F Littler | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $100,816 |
128 | Barbara Merry | Otis, KS 67565 | $99,978 |
129 | Louis A Dellett Jr | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $99,907 |
130 | Perry D Kreutzer | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $99,186 |
131 | Dr Jeffery Brozek | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $99,050 |
132 | Wilson Family Rev Tr No 2 | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $98,099 |
133 | Wilson Family Rev Tr No 1 | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $97,963 |
134 | Clifford C Bizek Real Estate Trust | Dallas, TX 75225 | $97,760 |
135 | Emile Frick | Nekoma, KS 67559 | $97,635 |
136 | Ethel M Dyer | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $97,120 |
137 | George Keener | Rush Center, KS 67575 | $95,556 |
138 | Bogleigh Wallah West LLC | Hutchinson, KS 67504 | $95,369 |
139 | David M & Fay L Dixon Ab Rev Liv Tr | Hilton Head Island, SC 29926 | $95,304 |
140 | Holopirek Living Trust | Mcpherson, KS 67460 | $94,681 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”