Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Rush County, Kansas, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 800
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Rush County, Kansas totaled $10,057,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Littler Farms Inc | Mc Cracken, KS 67556 | $97,284 |
22 | Mr Michael Younger -michael And Sarah Younger Trus | Bison, KS 67520 | $89,774 |
23 | Ken Urban - Ken & Melanie Urban Living Trust | Bison, KS 67520 | $89,290 |
24 | Richard Frick | Nekoma, KS 67559 | $85,726 |
25 | Bruce J Kershner | Rush Center, KS 67575 | $84,117 |
26 | North Brothers LLC | Mc Cracken, KS 67556 | $83,916 |
27 | A & Jt Trust 10-10-12 | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $83,136 |
28 | Cory J Wagner | Olmitz, KS 67564 | $81,122 |
29 | Hilltop Farms Inc | Rush Center, KS 67575 | $80,893 |
30 | Mathews Farm & Ranch Inc | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $80,696 |
31 | Chansler S Petz | Mc Cracken, KS 67556 | $79,374 |
32 | Ted Bannister | Hays, KS 67601 | $79,234 |
33 | Justin Lee Frick | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $77,179 |
34 | Maier Family Trust Dated 12-28-92 | Otis, KS 67565 | $75,123 |
35 | Richard T Luft | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $72,596 |
36 | James Webs | Alexander, KS 67513 | $70,053 |
37 | Peggy Janke Trust | Mc Cracken, KS 67556 | $69,768 |
38 | John Georg | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $69,506 |
39 | Travis L North | Mc Cracken, KS 67556 | $68,964 |
40 | Clifford C Bizek Real Estate Trust | Dallas, TX 75225 | $68,675 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”