Conservation Reserve Program in Russell County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,878
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Russell County, Kansas totaled $55,706,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lance Waymaster | Russell, KS 67665 | $220,340 |
42 | Anita J Farndale | San Carlos, CA 94070 | $211,364 |
43 | Schreiber Farms LLC | Claflin, KS 67525 | $210,218 |
44 | Steven P Yeakley Trust | Hoisington, KS 67544 | $207,525 |
45 | Jj & P Partners | Russell, KS 67665 | $207,069 |
46 | Lenice Crawford | Lucas, KS 67648 | $205,735 |
47 | Triple C Enterprises Inc | Russell, KS 67665 | $205,538 |
48 | Lewis W Eulert Living Trust | Hays, KS 67601 | $203,930 |
49 | Jay Hutchison | Russell, KS 67665 | $203,614 |
50 | John R Zamrzla | Wilson, KS 67490 | $200,897 |
51 | M G Oil Inc | Russell, KS 67665 | $195,803 |
52 | Stephen W & Martha Y Fuller Family Trust | College Station, TX 77845 | $191,206 |
53 | Sandra Rogg | Russell, KS 67665 | $188,958 |
54 | Doris I Brown Tr 1 | Russell, KS 67665 | $185,229 |
55 | Jean Haberer | Luray, KS 67649 | $179,988 |
56 | Mike Waymaster | Bunker Hill, KS 67626 | $179,806 |
57 | Dennis D & V Boepple Trust Boepple | Oviedo, FL 32765 | $179,197 |
58 | Martin R Bland | Luray, KS 67649 | $175,087 |
59 | Stranger Valley Land Co LLC | Russell, KS 67665 | $169,938 |
60 | Veverka 1990 Tr Ernest L | La Jolla, CA 92037 | $169,747 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”