Total Conservation Programs in Russell County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,826
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Russell County, Kansas totaled $53,259,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Morris III Tr William C | Bunker Hill, KS 67626 | $350,597 |
22 | Robert E Boxberger | Russell, KS 67665 | $346,148 |
23 | Norma J Goodheart Trust | Loveland, CO 80537 | $337,670 |
24 | Zweifel Living Trust | Luray, KS 67649 | $329,869 |
25 | Kejr Foundation Inc | Salina, KS 67402 | $324,848 |
26 | R Keith Steinle | Russell, KS 67665 | $312,119 |
27 | Anthony H Witt Jr Rev Tr | Russell, KS 67665 | $303,183 |
28 | Wallace N Weber | Overland Park, KS 66209 | $303,139 |
29 | Robert Layher | Hays, KS 67601 | $302,345 |
30 | Charles Waymaster | Lawrence, KS 66047 | $290,815 |
31 | Galen Niedenthal | Russell, KS 67665 | $287,293 |
32 | Frank C Davidson Heirs | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $279,522 |
33 | Mitchell J Mettlen/mitchell J Mettlen Tr 1 | Lucas, KS 67648 | $269,475 |
34 | Lester Corporation | Dorrance, KS 67634 | $268,721 |
35 | Carol R Shaffer Rev Living Trust | Waldo, KS 67673 | $266,033 |
36 | Richard W Berry Trust | Russell, KS 67665 | $264,969 |
37 | Tony J Shiroky | Luray, KS 67649 | $251,890 |
38 | Harry M Swart | Wilson, KS 67490 | $249,902 |
39 | Sam Maupin | Paradise, KS 67658 | $228,491 |
40 | Lance Waymaster | Russell, KS 67665 | $214,940 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”