Conservation Reserve Program in Scott County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 143
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $858,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Joel Miller | Scott City, KS 67871 | $45,422 |
2 | Hoeme Ranch & Cattle LLC | Scott City, KS 67871 | $37,586 |
3 | Vulgamore Cattle Co Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $35,942 |
4 | Mesquite Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $35,648 |
5 | Richard E Rudzik Tr Dated June 22 1992 | Ulysses, KS 67880 | $35,488 |
6 | Dora Mae Bowman | Scott City, KS 67871 | $34,792 |
7 | Isaac Land Inc | Peoria, AZ 85383 | $31,780 |
8 | Four Corners Farms | Garden City, KS 67846 | $30,548 |
9 | Isaac Farms Inc | Peoria, AZ 85383 | $29,596 |
10 | Berning Land & Cattle LLC | Modoc, KS 67863 | $29,126 |
11 | Russell -the Russell And Kathleen Isaac Trust Dtd | Peoria, AZ 85383 | $25,942 |
12 | Vulgamore Family Farms LLC | Scott City, KS 67871 | $25,834 |
13 | Coldwater Interest Lp | Scott City, KS 67871 | $24,010 |
14 | Morris Farms Inc | Kansas City, MO 64112 | $15,812 |
15 | Baker Boys Haying | Marienthal, KS 67863 | $15,164 |
16 | Jeff B Crist | Garden City, KS 67846 | $14,594 |
17 | Cynthia - Cynthia D Bradstreet Rev Trust D Bradstr | Dighton, KS 67839 | $14,207 |
18 | Larry Brown | Scott City, KS 67871 | $13,998 |
19 | , | $13,526 | |
20 | , | $13,371 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>