Market Loss Assistance Program in Scott County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,128
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $20,169,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | J & G Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $124,850 |
22 | Southwest Ag Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $124,632 |
23 | Bar-x Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $123,430 |
24 | Stacy Hoeme | Scott City, KS 67871 | $120,468 |
25 | Van L Buckner Revocable Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $120,272 |
26 | Rose Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $120,000 |
27 | Turner Cattle Co | Scott City, KS 67871 | $119,776 |
28 | Ljv Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $118,625 |
29 | Mike L Ellis | Scott City, KS 67871 | $118,293 |
30 | Dallas Savolt | Garden City, KS 67846 | $116,199 |
31 | Harkness Cattle & Land Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $115,156 |
32 | William John | Scott City, KS 67871 | $113,515 |
33 | Michael-michael B Harkness Trust B Harkness | Scott City, KS 67871 | $113,187 |
34 | George Ed Cupp | Scott City, KS 67871 | $112,337 |
35 | Doug Eugene Bahm | Scott City, KS 67871 | $111,010 |
36 | Novak Brothers | Modoc, KS 67863 | $110,946 |
37 | Griffith Cattle Co Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $110,916 |
38 | Patton Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $110,465 |
39 | Allan Hoeme | Scott City, KS 67871 | $110,276 |
40 | Prairie Trout Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $109,701 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”