Total Commodity Programs in Scott County, Kansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 384
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $2,512,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Amigo Cattle LLC | Broken Arrow, OK 74014 | $26,350 |
22 | Gerald L Frank | Scott City, KS 67871 | $26,148 |
23 | Mesquite Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $26,091 |
24 | Brent D Turner | Scott City, KS 67871 | $25,661 |
25 | Tip Off Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $25,553 |
26 | William H Nolan III | Scott City, KS 67871 | $25,247 |
27 | Florence E Berning | Scott City, KS 67871 | $25,024 |
28 | Kristi La Vone Schmitt | Scott City, KS 67871 | $24,756 |
29 | Ash Grove Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $24,061 |
30 | Gooden Enterprises LLC | Scott City, KS 67871 | $23,966 |
31 | Teresa A Berning | Scott City, KS 67871 | $23,771 |
32 | Berning Land & Cattle LLC | Modoc, KS 67863 | $23,680 |
33 | , | $22,458 | |
34 | Aaron J Beaton | Scott City, KS 67871 | $22,369 |
35 | Nicholas B Berning | Scott City, KS 67871 | $22,025 |
36 | Red Cedar Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $19,477 |
37 | Mark Ellis | Scott City, KS 67871 | $18,880 |
38 | Colleen S Beaton-colleen S Beaton Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $18,641 |
39 | Hoeme & Hoeme Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $18,286 |
40 | Joyce M Schmitt Rev Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $17,564 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”