Farm Subsidy information
Scott County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Scott County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 851
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $21,406,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Heartland Feeders Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $59,137 |
42 | Van A Buckner | Scott City, KS 67871 | $58,618 |
43 | Gary Janssen Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $57,978 |
44 | Kenton D Geist | Scott City, KS 67871 | $56,682 |
45 | Cornerstone Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $55,496 |
46 | Western Prairie Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $54,615 |
47 | H & H Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $54,592 |
48 | Chaston A Hoeme | Scott City, KS 67871 | $54,052 |
49 | Poky Feeders Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $53,832 |
50 | Hrc Feedyards LLC | Scott City, KS 67871 | $52,963 |
51 | Wide Horizons | Dighton, KS 67839 | $51,226 |
52 | Prairie Trout Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $50,902 |
53 | Wilken Farms Inc | Roanoke, TX 76262 | $50,771 |
54 | Cheryl-cheryl K. Martin Trust No.1 K France | Scott City, KS 67871 | $50,765 |
55 | Jan Wilkinson | Scott City, KS 67871 | $49,766 |
56 | Southwest Ag Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $48,376 |
57 | Hell Creek Ranch Inc | Dighton, KS 67839 | $48,014 |
58 | Chad Griffith | Scott City, KS 67871 | $47,729 |
59 | C Laylene Janssen Trust No 1 | Scott City, KS 67871 | $47,663 |
60 | Jon R Buehler Living Tr | Scott City, KS 67871 | $47,551 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”