Farm Subsidy information
Scott County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Scott County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 490
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $28,753,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Vulgamore Cattle Co Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $100,194 |
42 | Berning Land & Cattle LLC | Modoc, KS 67863 | $97,859 |
43 | Steven D Compton | Scott City, KS 67871 | $97,552 |
44 | Robert And Donna Eitel Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $96,357 |
45 | , | $91,058 | |
46 | Jonathan T Berning | Scott City, KS 67871 | $90,631 |
47 | Shelly R Turner | Scott City, KS 67871 | $89,175 |
48 | Chad Griffith | Scott City, KS 67871 | $85,825 |
49 | Aaron Rosin | Scott City, KS 67871 | $84,992 |
50 | Luann Buehler Living Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $80,762 |
51 | Brent D Turner | Scott City, KS 67871 | $80,425 |
52 | Devin K Hutchins | Scott City, KS 67871 | $79,032 |
53 | Chad D Unruh | Scott City, KS 67871 | $74,873 |
54 | Michael L Scheuerman | Healy, KS 67850 | $73,519 |
55 | 01 Cattle Co Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $73,309 |
56 | Nicholas B Berning | Scott City, KS 67871 | $71,846 |
57 | Buehler Grain & Forage Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $70,597 |
58 | Bar-x Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $70,281 |
59 | Jon R Buehler Living Tr | Scott City, KS 67871 | $70,228 |
60 | Jeff S Huslig | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $69,938 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”