Farm Subsidy information
Scott County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Scott County, Kansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 621
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $26,154,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Metzger Family Farm Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $53,310 |
42 | Ash Grove Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $51,160 |
43 | L & J Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $46,500 |
44 | Mccarty Farms Scott City LLC | Colby, KS 67701 | $45,357 |
45 | Chaston A Hoeme | Scott City, KS 67871 | $42,061 |
46 | Rose Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $41,894 |
47 | Vulgamore Cattle Co Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $41,762 |
48 | , | $40,890 | |
49 | Hughes Land & Livestock | Scott City, KS 67871 | $40,285 |
50 | Mark Ellis | Scott City, KS 67871 | $38,374 |
51 | Hb Land & Livestock Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $38,274 |
52 | Byron Clifton Sowers | Healy, KS 67850 | $37,206 |
53 | Haag Family Farms Ptnr | Wichita, KS 67226 | $37,186 |
54 | Gerald L Frank | Scott City, KS 67871 | $36,996 |
55 | Richard L Duff | Scott City, KS 67871 | $36,933 |
56 | Craig B Tuttle | Scott City, KS 67871 | $36,913 |
57 | Wesseler Farms West LLC | Lorraine, KS 67459 | $36,329 |
58 | Richard E Rudzik Tr Dated June 22 1992 | Ulysses, KS 67880 | $35,488 |
59 | Gordon Goering | Moundridge, KS 67107 | $35,487 |
60 | Circle C Cattle Corp | Garden City, KS 67846 | $35,431 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”