Market Gains in Scott County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 82
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $813,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | J Raymond Radnor | Scott City, KS 67871 | $3,012 |
42 | L-bo Land And Livestock | Scott City, KS 67871 | $2,960 |
43 | Cloy Logan | Scott City, KS 67871 | $2,914 |
44 | Daryl Dirks | Scott City, KS 67871 | $2,864 |
45 | Ronald J Suppes | Dighton, KS 67839 | $2,627 |
46 | Charles M Bloom | Oakley, KS 67748 | $2,473 |
47 | Mark Ellis | Scott City, KS 67871 | $2,446 |
48 | Shirley K Suppes | Dighton, KS 67839 | $2,433 |
49 | Howard L Spitzer | Scott City, KS 67871 | $2,203 |
50 | Michael-michael B Harkness Trust B Harkness | Scott City, KS 67871 | $2,201 |
51 | Melba M Trout Tr No 1 | Scott City, KS 67871 | $1,831 |
52 | Greg Larson LLC - Gregory Larson | Haxtun, CO 80731 | $1,776 |
53 | Patton Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $1,661 |
54 | Roger J Powers | Garden City, KS 67846 | $1,650 |
55 | Manning Hogs Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $1,575 |
56 | Hilary Kessler | Scott City, KS 67871 | $1,575 |
57 | Marvin L Knopp Rev Trust | Branson, MO 65616 | $1,484 |
58 | C Socolofsky Trust | Oakley, KS 67748 | $1,236 |
59 | Larry L Huck | Scott City, KS 67871 | $1,142 |
60 | Neal Bradstreet | Dighton, KS 67839 | $1,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”