Total Conservation Programs in Scott County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 584
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $22,936,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Eldora Mcminimy | Ashland, KS 67831 | $139,663 |
42 | Isaac Farms Inc | Peoria, AZ 85383 | $137,656 |
43 | Roberta Scheideman | Scott City, KS 67871 | $132,104 |
44 | Carol Rose Rev Tr | Overland Park, KS 66212 | $131,916 |
45 | Albert Savolt Jr | Garden City, KS 67846 | $131,849 |
46 | Robinson Farms Inc | Land O Lakes, FL 34637 | $129,892 |
47 | Huseman Enterprises Lp | Scott City, KS 67871 | $129,791 |
48 | Michael S See | Scott City, KS 67871 | $126,317 |
49 | Dennis D Crist | Garden City, KS 67846 | $126,000 |
50 | Vulgamore Family Farms LLC | Scott City, KS 67871 | $123,770 |
51 | Allan Hoeme | Scott City, KS 67871 | $123,304 |
52 | Bruce Whitham | Liberal, KS 67901 | $121,254 |
53 | Carl L Scheideman | Scott City, KS 67871 | $120,149 |
54 | Thompson - Welch Fam Welch | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $118,702 |
55 | Michael-michael B Harkness Trust B Harkness | Scott City, KS 67871 | $117,264 |
56 | Lewis Rose Revocable Trust | Overland Park, KS 66212 | $112,209 |
57 | Kenton Harkness | Garden City, KS 67846 | $109,002 |
58 | Russell -the Russell And Kathleen Isaac Trust Dtd | Peoria, AZ 85383 | $107,274 |
59 | Doris J Crist Rev Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $106,771 |
60 | Stacy Hoeme | Scott City, KS 67871 | $106,256 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”