Farm Subsidy information
Scott County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Scott County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 851
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $21,406,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Luann Buehler Living Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $47,543 |
62 | Mark Ellis | Scott City, KS 67871 | $47,516 |
63 | Craig B Tuttle | Scott City, KS 67871 | $47,303 |
64 | Michael L Scheuerman | Healy, KS 67850 | $46,472 |
65 | Paul F Strickert | Scott City, KS 67871 | $46,459 |
66 | Nicholas B Berning | Scott City, KS 67871 | $45,670 |
67 | Hughes Land & Livestock | Scott City, KS 67871 | $45,598 |
68 | Donna S Eitel | Scott City, KS 67871 | $45,311 |
69 | Coldwater Interest Lp | Scott City, KS 67871 | $44,494 |
70 | Berning Land & Cattle LLC | Modoc, KS 67863 | $44,409 |
71 | Galen Decker | Scott City, KS 67871 | $44,307 |
72 | Wasinger Brothers | Scott City, KS 67871 | $43,476 |
73 | Michael J Richmeier | Garden City, KS 67846 | $43,434 |
74 | Weathers Land & Livestock Partnership | Scott City, KS 67871 | $43,419 |
75 | Prairie Sunset Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $43,237 |
76 | 01 Cattle Co Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $42,950 |
77 | Robert And Donna Eitel Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $42,743 |
78 | William A Huseman Trust No 1 | Dighton, KS 67839 | $42,381 |
79 | The Bank ** | Winona, KS 67764 | $42,141 |
80 | C Arrow Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $41,832 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”