Farm Subsidy information
Scott County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Scott County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 490
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $28,753,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Florence E Berning | Scott City, KS 67871 | $65,804 |
62 | L & J Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $64,962 |
63 | Gary Janssen Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $62,603 |
64 | Metzger Family Farm Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $61,910 |
65 | Triple C Grain Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $60,274 |
66 | Fairleigh Ranch | Scott City, KS 67871 | $59,686 |
67 | Dwight Koehn | Scott City, KS 67871 | $58,043 |
68 | C Laylene Janssen Trust No 1 | Scott City, KS 67871 | $57,606 |
69 | Terrence A Berning | Scott City, KS 67871 | $57,221 |
70 | Paul W Numrich Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $57,219 |
71 | , | $57,180 | |
72 | Coldwater Interest Lp | Scott City, KS 67871 | $55,532 |
73 | Clifton K Ottaway | Hays, KS 67601 | $54,779 |
74 | Richard L & Lori S Krause Living Tr | Modoc, KS 67863 | $54,752 |
75 | C Arrow Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $51,698 |
76 | Cornerstone Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $51,370 |
77 | Prairie Trout Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $50,945 |
78 | Chaston A Hoeme | Scott City, KS 67871 | $50,257 |
79 | Van A Buckner | Scott City, KS 67871 | $49,692 |
80 | Steven R Ratzlaff | Scott City, KS 67871 | $49,392 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”