Total Conservation Programs in Scott County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 584
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $22,936,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Dallas Savolt | Garden City, KS 67846 | $105,521 |
62 | Dora Mae Bowman | Scott City, KS 67871 | $104,376 |
63 | Nathan J Herron | Scott City, KS 67871 | $103,530 |
64 | Melvin O Nuss Tr No 1 | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $100,623 |
65 | Charles H Moore Jr | Modoc, KS 67863 | $99,817 |
66 | Flying M Ranch Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $99,622 |
67 | William H Nolan III | Scott City, KS 67871 | $99,324 |
68 | Dwight Krebs | Scott City, KS 67871 | $97,305 |
69 | Joel Miller | Scott City, KS 67871 | $90,844 |
70 | Bridges Family Farms Inc | Camarillo, CA 93010 | $89,440 |
71 | Crown C 1 LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85020 | $87,894 |
72 | Kelly J Crist | Scott City, KS 67871 | $86,935 |
73 | Western Prairie Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $86,496 |
74 | Corinne Krebs | Scott City, KS 67871 | $85,599 |
75 | Iva Crist Keyse Carr Rev Tr | Leoti, KS 67861 | $85,416 |
76 | Ethel J Van Campen | Bigfork, MT 59911 | $82,602 |
77 | Mesquite Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $82,601 |
78 | Four Corners Farms | Garden City, KS 67846 | $82,204 |
79 | Neal Bradstreet | Dighton, KS 67839 | $81,363 |
80 | Ash Grove Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $81,122 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”