Farm Subsidy information
Scott County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Scott County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 851
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $21,406,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | M Gregory Dirks | Scott City, KS 67871 | $40,685 |
82 | Kristi La Vone Schmitt | Scott City, KS 67871 | $40,056 |
83 | Sondra C Crook | Leawood, KS 66209 | $37,846 |
84 | Jordan Unruh | Scott City, KS 67871 | $37,836 |
85 | Robert Hoeme Jr | Scott City, KS 67871 | $37,731 |
86 | Hoeme Ranch & Cattle LLC | Scott City, KS 67871 | $37,586 |
87 | Four Corners Farms | Garden City, KS 67846 | $37,542 |
88 | Wilkens Inc | Gt Barrington, MA 01230 | $36,280 |
89 | Bar-x Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $36,218 |
90 | Joel Miller | Scott City, KS 67871 | $36,097 |
91 | Dannie Bahm Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $35,537 |
92 | Richard E Rudzik Tr Dated June 22 1992 | Ulysses, KS 67880 | $35,488 |
93 | Hb Land & Livestock Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $35,420 |
94 | Terrell Dirks | Scott City, KS 67871 | $35,228 |
95 | Dora Mae Bowman | Scott City, KS 67871 | $34,792 |
96 | Ramsey Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $34,459 |
97 | Doug Eugene Bahm | Scott City, KS 67871 | $34,436 |
98 | Michael C Schmitt | Scott City, KS 67871 | $34,369 |
99 | Crist Organic Farms LLC | Scott City, KS 67871 | $34,036 |
100 | Matt Novak | Modoc, KS 67863 | $33,923 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”