Farm Subsidy information
Scott County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Scott County, Kansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 621
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $26,154,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Larry R Willson 2000 Rev Trust | Derby, KS 67037 | $25,329 |
82 | Florence E Berning | Scott City, KS 67871 | $25,024 |
83 | Stacy Hoeme | Scott City, KS 67871 | $24,930 |
84 | Kristi La Vone Schmitt | Scott City, KS 67871 | $24,756 |
85 | Zanobia Farm & Ranch Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $24,101 |
86 | Gooden Enterprises LLC | Scott City, KS 67871 | $23,966 |
87 | Marian C Nolan | Scott City, KS 67871 | $23,910 |
88 | Teresa A Berning | Scott City, KS 67871 | $23,771 |
89 | John C Beaton-john C Beaton Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $22,992 |
90 | Sidney Janzen | Scott City, KS 67871 | $22,957 |
91 | Zachery Conine | Scott City, KS 67871 | $22,769 |
92 | , | $22,685 | |
93 | Norman Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $22,645 |
94 | Terrell Dirks | Scott City, KS 67871 | $22,620 |
95 | Loren C Janzen Irrevocable Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $22,586 |
96 | Nicholas B Berning | Scott City, KS 67871 | $22,025 |
97 | Rodric Eugene Berning | Modoc, KS 67863 | $22,002 |
98 | Circle C Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $21,997 |
99 | Darrel J Lundgren | Gove, KS 67736 | $20,840 |
100 | B4us LLC | Scott City, KS 67871 | $19,863 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”