Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Scott County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 698
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $5,929,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Barbara J Hintz Rev Trust | Parker, CO 80134 | $21,843 |
82 | Mal Content Farm Corp | Scott City, KS 67871 | $21,511 |
83 | Vulgamore Land & Cattle Co Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $21,509 |
84 | Allan Hoeme | Scott City, KS 67871 | $20,779 |
85 | Bill J Winderlin | Scott City, KS 67871 | $20,497 |
86 | Juanita Janssen Rev Trust | Manhattan, KS 66503 | $20,263 |
87 | C Arrow Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $20,227 |
88 | Clifton K Ottaway | Hays, KS 67601 | $19,744 |
89 | J & G Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $19,317 |
90 | Baker Boys Haying | Marienthal, KS 67863 | $18,372 |
91 | M & G Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $18,300 |
92 | Florence E Berning | Scott City, KS 67871 | $18,255 |
93 | Terrence A Berning | Scott City, KS 67871 | $18,161 |
94 | William A Huseman-wm Huseman Tr N | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $17,376 |
95 | Jan Wilkinson | Scott City, KS 67871 | $17,242 |
96 | Rocking R Farms LLC | Princeton, KS 66078 | $17,226 |
97 | , | $17,024 | |
98 | Red Cedar Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $16,974 |
99 | Jack S Schmitt | Scott City, KS 67871 | $16,368 |
100 | Cheney Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $16,155 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”