Conservation Reserve Program in Scott County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 143
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $858,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Joshua Todd Dirks | Scott City, KS 67871 | $1,405 |
82 | Wiechman Land & Cattle | Scott City, KS 67871 | $1,326 |
83 | Weathers Land & Livestock Partnership | Scott City, KS 67871 | $1,308 |
84 | Ronald C Weathers | Scott City, KS 67871 | $1,307 |
85 | Janet K Robson Trust | Spearville, KS 67876 | $1,276 |
86 | Nancy S Cain Trust | Spearville, KS 67876 | $1,276 |
87 | , | $1,268 | |
88 | Damw Lllp | Scott City, KS 67871 | $1,232 |
89 | Jan L Norman | Scott City, KS 67871 | $1,162 |
90 | Wilkens Inc | Gt Barrington, MA 01230 | $1,078 |
91 | William J Kind Rev Trust | Chapman, KS 67431 | $1,051 |
92 | , | $1,043 | |
93 | Chaston A Hoeme | Scott City, KS 67871 | $990 |
94 | Flying M Ranch Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $885 |
95 | Sandra S Ball | Wichita, KS 67209 | $877 |
96 | Jerre D Bontrager Rev Trust | Milford, NE 68405 | $861 |
97 | Anita G Hoeme-anita Hoeme Rev Tr | Scott City, KS 67871 | $827 |
98 | , | $808 | |
99 | Gary L Haupt | Scott City, KS 67871 | $781 |
100 | Terry E Bradstreet | Overland Park, KS 66224 | $695 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”