Total Disaster Programs in Scott County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 406
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $12,434,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Paula L Vulgamore | Scott City, KS 67871 | $45,886 |
82 | Colleen S Beaton-colleen S Beaton Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $45,791 |
83 | K-2 Farms Revocable Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $45,437 |
84 | H & H Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $43,769 |
85 | Galen Decker | Scott City, KS 67871 | $43,283 |
86 | Ash Grove Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $42,868 |
87 | Elizabeth Vulgamore | Scott City, KS 67871 | $42,862 |
88 | Randall K Scheuerman | Scott City, KS 67871 | $42,015 |
89 | Hughes Land & Livestock | Scott City, KS 67871 | $40,474 |
90 | Brian C Vulgamore | Scott City, KS 67871 | $39,901 |
91 | John C Beaton-john C Beaton Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $39,818 |
92 | Horsethief Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $39,660 |
93 | Hoeme & Hoeme Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $37,626 |
94 | Myles F Vulgamore | Scott City, KS 67871 | $37,271 |
95 | Kateri M Couchman | Scott City, KS 67871 | $37,230 |
96 | Carlotta Brack | Leoti, KS 67861 | $36,649 |
97 | Jordan Unruh | Scott City, KS 67871 | $34,896 |
98 | Dearden Brothers | Scott City, KS 67871 | $34,465 |
99 | Holly M Beaton | Scott City, KS 67871 | $33,721 |
100 | Southwest Ag Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $33,343 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”