Direct Payment Program in Scott County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,390
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $54,490,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jeffry A Wilkinson Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $193,838 |
82 | Jack Miller Trust | Aspen, CO 81612 | $187,033 |
83 | K & C Janzen Irrev Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $181,121 |
84 | Michael L Scheuerman | Healy, KS 67850 | $180,938 |
85 | Charles L Griffith Revocable Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $177,740 |
86 | Terrence A Berning | Scott City, KS 67871 | $176,567 |
87 | Richard L & Lori S Krause Living Tr | Modoc, KS 67863 | $176,511 |
88 | Williams Cattle Co Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $176,259 |
89 | Metzger Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $175,022 |
90 | Greg Skibbe | Scott City, KS 67871 | $171,457 |
91 | David K Unruh | Scott City, KS 67871 | $171,394 |
92 | Patton Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $170,010 |
93 | Lynn Pammenter Rev Lv Tr | Scott City, KS 67871 | $169,028 |
94 | Sue Pammenter Rev Lv Tr | Scott City, KS 67871 | $169,017 |
95 | E&d Farms | Marienthal, KS 67863 | $168,342 |
96 | Mesquite Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $167,650 |
97 | K2 Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $166,580 |
98 | David F Novak Tr | Modoc, KS 67863 | $160,091 |
99 | Sherry L Novak Tr | Modoc, KS 67863 | $160,068 |
100 | Norman Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $160,054 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”