Total Conservation Programs in Scott County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 584
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $22,936,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Larry L Huck | Scott City, KS 67871 | $79,643 |
82 | Morris Farms Inc | Kansas City, MO 64112 | $79,060 |
83 | Richard V Van Campen | Bigfork, MT 59911 | $77,847 |
84 | Marc C Shirk | Hutchinson, KS 67502 | $77,250 |
85 | R & L Farms | Garden City, KS 67846 | $76,880 |
86 | Floyd M Krebs | Scott City, KS 67871 | $76,794 |
87 | Kershner Cattle Inc | Junction City, KS 66441 | $75,210 |
88 | Robert D Miller Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $73,882 |
89 | Bill J Hunt | Scott City, KS 67871 | $73,780 |
90 | Hell Creek Ranch Inc | Dighton, KS 67839 | $73,374 |
91 | Coldwater Interest Lp | Scott City, KS 67871 | $73,261 |
92 | Jack J Meyers | Cunningham, KS 67035 | $71,818 |
93 | Jonathan T Berning | Scott City, KS 67871 | $71,758 |
94 | J Maxine Huck Trust | Protection, KS 67127 | $71,614 |
95 | Lynette K Russell Rev Tr | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $70,014 |
96 | Duff Land & Cattle Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $69,856 |
97 | Dora Mae Bowman | Scott City, KS 67871 | $69,584 |
98 | Betty Hoeme | Scott City, KS 67871 | $67,954 |
99 | Delmar Huck | Scott City, KS 67871 | $64,260 |
100 | Geneva M Stucky Rev Family Tr | Park City, KS 67219 | $62,720 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”