Total Commodity Programs in Scott County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,467
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $245,392,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Turner Cattle Co | Scott City, KS 67871 | $725,593 |
82 | Mike L Ellis | Scott City, KS 67871 | $723,046 |
83 | E&d Farms | Marienthal, KS 67863 | $715,616 |
84 | Albert Savolt Jr | Garden City, KS 67846 | $712,030 |
85 | K U Farms LLC | Scott City, KS 67871 | $708,533 |
86 | Sue Pammenter Rev Lv Tr | Scott City, KS 67871 | $696,113 |
87 | Dennis E Allen | Scott City, KS 67871 | $695,563 |
88 | Lynn Pammenter Rev Lv Tr | Scott City, KS 67871 | $695,293 |
89 | Dennis M Bontrager Revocable Trus | Scott City, KS 67871 | $689,094 |
90 | Richard L & Lori S Krause Living Tr | Modoc, KS 67863 | $686,397 |
91 | Sidney Y Janzen Revocable Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $682,603 |
92 | Donna S Eitel | Scott City, KS 67871 | $676,931 |
93 | Greg Skibbe | Scott City, KS 67871 | $673,408 |
94 | Gooden Enterprises LLC | Scott City, KS 67871 | $672,499 |
95 | Jack Dale Frick | Lakeland, FL 33813 | $671,788 |
96 | Williams Cattle Co Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $654,822 |
97 | David F Novak Tr | Modoc, KS 67863 | $647,022 |
98 | Sherry L Novak Tr | Modoc, KS 67863 | $646,902 |
99 | Michael L Scheuerman | Healy, KS 67850 | $643,301 |
100 | George Ed Cupp | Scott City, KS 67871 | $640,359 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”