Total Commodity Programs in Scott County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 2,467
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $245,392,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Jeffry A Wilkinson Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $518,340 |
122 | Daryl Dirks | Scott City, KS 67871 | $517,642 |
123 | B-d Farms Inc | Garden City, KS 67846 | $511,524 |
124 | Jesse L Cole | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $510,363 |
125 | Shelly R Turner | Scott City, KS 67871 | $510,277 |
126 | Dannie Bahm Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $507,916 |
127 | Alan D Williams | Scott City, KS 67871 | $501,647 |
128 | Randall K Scheuerman | Scott City, KS 67871 | $496,675 |
129 | M Gregory Dirks | Scott City, KS 67871 | $496,413 |
130 | Harkness Cattle & Land Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $496,125 |
131 | Leon E France Administrative Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $495,018 |
132 | Kenton D Geist | Scott City, KS 67871 | $481,496 |
133 | Kimball Cattle Co Inc | Ulysses, KS 67880 | $480,029 |
134 | Jack S Schmitt | Scott City, KS 67871 | $477,111 |
135 | Clifton K Ottaway | Hays, KS 67601 | $468,392 |
136 | Juanita Janssen Rev Trust | Manhattan, KS 66503 | $458,626 |
137 | Jonathan T Berning | Scott City, KS 67871 | $458,189 |
138 | Ronald R Riner | Scott City, KS 67871 | $450,876 |
139 | Jack Miller Trust | Aspen, CO 81612 | $449,933 |
140 | Boyd R Funk | Garden City, KS 67846 | $445,451 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”