Direct Payment Program in Scott County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,390
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $54,490,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Eaton Enterprises Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $375,483 |
22 | Janssen Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $371,377 |
23 | Circle C Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $370,492 |
24 | Flying V Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $370,466 |
25 | J & G Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $369,599 |
26 | Robert Hoeme Jr | Scott City, KS 67871 | $368,921 |
27 | Ramsey Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $360,361 |
28 | Vulgamore Land & Cattle Co Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $347,657 |
29 | Ljv Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $344,091 |
30 | Allan Hoeme | Scott City, KS 67871 | $343,899 |
31 | Dannie Bahm | Scott City, KS 67871 | $338,046 |
32 | Van L Buckner Revocable Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $335,901 |
33 | Novak Brothers | Modoc, KS 67863 | $325,932 |
34 | Southwest Ag Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $323,411 |
35 | Mal Content Farm Corp | Scott City, KS 67871 | $313,654 |
36 | Galen Decker | Scott City, KS 67871 | $307,047 |
37 | Hughes Land & Livestock | Scott City, KS 67871 | $303,285 |
38 | Bar-x Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $302,216 |
39 | 01 Cattle Co Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $294,024 |
40 | Red Thunder Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $290,568 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”