Farm Subsidy information
Seward County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Seward County, Kansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 496
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Seward County, Kansas totaled $12,548,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Devin L Walker | Kismet, KS 67859 | $11,054 |
122 | , | $10,616 | |
123 | Deh Trust | Hot Springs National, AR 71901 | $10,604 |
124 | Siemens Family Farm LLC | Ulysses, KS 67880 | $10,554 |
125 | David Headrick | Liberal, KS 67901 | $10,471 |
126 | The Martha C Greeson Irrevocable Trust | Vero Beach, FL 32967 | $10,387 |
127 | Headrick Farms Inc | Kismet, KS 67859 | $10,383 |
128 | John Jacobs | Plains, KS 67869 | $10,346 |
129 | Nancy S Allen Living Trust | Liberal, KS 67901 | $10,230 |
130 | Cooper Clark Foundation | Liberal, KS 67905 | $10,192 |
131 | Walker Farms Inc | Kismet, KS 67859 | $10,044 |
132 | Gennelle J Linville Separate Property Trust | Santa Barbara, CA 93103 | $10,037 |
133 | Jac Kids Lc | Liberal, KS 67901 | $10,003 |
134 | Charles Kulow Trust | Liberal, KS 67901 | $10,000 |
135 | , | $9,920 | |
136 | Martin B Reimer | Meade, KS 67864 | $9,772 |
137 | William H Hatcher | Satanta, KS 67870 | $9,702 |
138 | Toni L Smith | Moscow, KS 67952 | $9,636 |
139 | Wilma R Hinz | Beatrice, NE 68310 | $9,580 |
140 | Harvey Thomas Thompson Revocable Trust | Liberal, KS 67901 | $9,294 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”